Georgia-calibrated PI case intelligence reports for personal injury firms. We evaluate case quality, identify coverage, surface risk, and estimate realistic recovery before time and money get wasted.
We convert messy intake notes, texts, and emails into decision-grade reports that show:
Bottom line: Legitimate and winnable, but capped. Value comes from disciplined execution, not aggressive overvaluation.
Built for firms that want better intake decisions, clearer case expectations, and less missed money on UM/UIM and coverage structure.
Spot weak files, gray-zone cases, and hidden winners before the firm commits time and cost.
Flag UM/UIM, resident-relative issues, stacking potential, and commercial policy exposure early.
Set realistic value ranges and identify the defense points that will compress the claim.
Not all cases are created equal. Neither are their outcomes. These four sample reports show how the system distinguishes risky files from premium exposure cases.
Low-ceiling file. Value constrained by weak mechanism, prior-condition exposure, and absent secondary coverage.
View PDFLegitimate value with controlled upside. Near BI limits, with moderate UM potential only if confirmed and sequenced correctly.
View PDFClear liability, high-force mechanism, and meaningful escalation. BI should tender; UM becomes the upside layer.
View PDFTop-tier policy-driven case. Surgery, force, and coverage align to create serious settlement and litigation exposure.
View PDFSimple workflow. No software integration required to start.
Simple starting structure. Adjust later once recurring volume is established.
One case review for qualified firms.
Depending on complexity and coverage analysis required.
For firms sending recurring volume.
No. These reports are for internal case evaluation and strategy support only.
No. We can start from messy intake notes or an attorney text, then refine as more information comes in.
Yes. Coverage structure, resident-relative issues, and realistic UM/UIM recovery are a core part of the analysis.